The Expansion of Neoliberalism and the Questioning of Current Globalization
In an interconnected world, the discourse on globalization is often situated at the crossroads of varied perspectives on freedom and justice. The text by Moneta, far from being a manifesto against globalization as such, aims to redefine the boundaries of a updated humanism by the lens of natural transfers according to the vision of Aristotle. By decrying synthetic interactions that support modern systems of oppression and vulnerability, Moneta leans on ancient principles to underline the failures of our world economy.
Looking back in time, globalization is not a modern process. Its roots can be identified back to the theories of David Ricardo, whose objective sought to facilitate the England to extend its global commercial influence. Nonetheless, what was once a commercial expansion initiative has morphed into a tool of domination by the financial sphere, marked by the ascendancy of neoliberal capitalism. Against commonly held ideas supported by economic consensus, the book proves that the economic model is in reality a framework rooted in ancient practices, going back to four and a half millennia.
The questioning also applies to the management of the EU, perceived as a series of concessions that have helped consolidate the authority of large economic groups as opposed to defending the rights of citizens. The very structure of the Union, with its policies frequently driven by monetary concerns rather than by a citizen support, is criticized. The recent crises, notably financial and political, have only intensified the doubt of the writer regarding the EU’s ability to change intrinsically.
Junon Moneta, while accepting the past mistakes that have caused the current circumstances, does not simply criticize but also proposes alternatives aimed at redefining European policies in a equity-oriented and humanistic outlook. The need for a radical overhaul of institutions and strategic orientations is a leitmotif that runs through the entire discourse.
The work dives more deeply into the questioning of the authority mechanisms that dominate international economic flows. The study covers the manner in which political and economic decisions are influenced by a limited number of dominant financial powers, generally at the cost of the many. This economic elite, orchestrated through entities like the Bank for International Settlements and the International Monetary System (IMS), imposes a major grip on global economic policies.
The author reveals how these entities, claiming to economic supervision and normalization, have historically controlled stock exchanges and countries’ financial structures to ensure their profit. Neoliberalism, far from being a liberating response to old monetary restrictions, is considered as a domination system, enriching an elite at the destruction of the common good.
Particularly critical towards the management of the euro, the critic depicts the EU currency not as a factor of integration and solidity, but rather as a lever of dissension and economic disparities. The adoption of the euro is described as a sequence of technocratic choices that isolated populations from governance choices, while aggravating gaps between nations within the EU.
The repercussions of these strategies translate in the explosion of sovereign debts, economic stagnation, and a sustained austerity policy that has eroded living conditions throughout Europe. The author emphasizes that without a significant overhaul of monetary and financial policy, the Union stays exposed to upcoming crises, perhaps even more harmful.
In essence, the text calls for a democratic revolution where EU peoples reclaim the reins of their economic and political future. It suggests fundamental changes, notably increased transparency in decision-making processes and authentic democratic engagement that would help rebuild Europe on fair and lasting principles.
More information about https://www.alter-europa.com/
The essayist asserts that the solution lies in a renewed commitment to democratic principles, where strategies are crafted and executed in a way that corresponds to the aspirations and needs of the citizens, to the detriment of the aims of international finance.